<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Every multimedia developer&#8217;s nightmare&#8230;the LCMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bottomlineperformance.com/lolblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bottomlineperformance.com/lolblog/?p=1002</link>
	<description>Lessons on Learning: a blog about how we learn and the technologies that support learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle</title>
		<link>http://www.bottomlineperformance.com/lolblog/?p=1002#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bottomlineperformance.com/lolblog/?p=1002#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I completely agree with you! I also find it amusing how a new development tool will be promoted as &quot;so easy anyone can use it&quot;, which may be true. They just forget to tell you that it takes 4 clicks to delete an object or that the save button kicks you out of the development tool requiring you to re-enter the course to continue where you left off...clearly, a &quot;bonkers workflow&quot;. There&#039;s a lot to be said for ease of use with a logical and efficient workflow, that is.

Thanks for your comments...all the way from Ireland even!

Gayle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I completely agree with you! I also find it amusing how a new development tool will be promoted as &#8220;so easy anyone can use it&#8221;, which may be true. They just forget to tell you that it takes 4 clicks to delete an object or that the save button kicks you out of the development tool requiring you to re-enter the course to continue where you left off&#8230;clearly, a &#8220;bonkers workflow&#8221;. There&#8217;s a lot to be said for ease of use with a logical and efficient workflow, that is.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments&#8230;all the way from Ireland even!</p>
<p>Gayle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hanley</title>
		<link>http://www.bottomlineperformance.com/lolblog/?p=1002#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bottomlineperformance.com/lolblog/?p=1002#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Even worse than an authoring tools tied to an LMS/LCMS... the proprietary in-house content development tool. I&#039;ve had the unfortunate experience of encountering these in some very large COTS e-learning vendors (I live in Ireland - have a guess who they are - used to have &#039;Systems&#039; and a &#039;C&#039; and a &#039;B&#039; and a &#039;T&#039; in their name). Java-based, lousy UI, bizarre file formats and extensions, and a truly bonkers workflow. 

--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even worse than an authoring tools tied to an LMS/LCMS&#8230; the proprietary in-house content development tool. I&#8217;ve had the unfortunate experience of encountering these in some very large COTS e-learning vendors (I live in Ireland &#8211; have a guess who they are &#8211; used to have &#8216;Systems&#8217; and a &#8216;C&#8217; and a &#8216;B&#8217; and a &#8216;T&#8217; in their name). Java-based, lousy UI, bizarre file formats and extensions, and a truly bonkers workflow. </p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
